Farm Subsidy information
Gallatin County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Gallatin County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,394
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gallatin County, Montana totaled $100,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dan Kimm Certified Seed Potatoes | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $454,757 |
42 | Richard J Morgan | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $451,398 |
43 | B & T Farms Inc | Gallatin Gateway, MT 59730 | $450,043 |
44 | Fmb LLC | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $449,801 |
45 | Dyk & Sons Ld & Ctl | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $422,255 |
46 | Lance Dehaan | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $418,144 |
47 | Circle Four Ranch | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $414,926 |
48 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $410,058 |
49 | Saddle Mountain Ranches | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $406,367 |
50 | L F Dairy Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $406,291 |
51 | Alberda Grain & Lvsk Inc | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $399,423 |
52 | Kamps Ranches | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $393,411 |
53 | William J Cok | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $392,685 |
54 | Sinnema Flikkema Ranch Co | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $384,045 |
55 | Maynard A Flikkema | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $383,204 |
56 | Larry A Klompien | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $382,398 |
57 | Kamps Seed Farm LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $377,568 |
58 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $365,915 |
59 | Edwin D Brainard | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $363,164 |
60 | Zales Ecton III | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $359,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”