Farm Subsidy information
Gallatin County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Gallatin County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 285
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gallatin County, Montana totaled $3,573,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | William Tatarka | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $36,610 |
| 22 | Kv Farms LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $34,905 |
| 23 | Camp Creek Land & Cattle Co | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $34,898 |
| 24 | R E Green Inc | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $34,238 |
| 25 | Smieja Hay And Grain LLC | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $34,007 |
| 26 | Kimm Dairy | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $32,359 |
| 27 | Reich Brothers | Willow Creek, MT 59760 | $31,992 |
| 28 | Carl Schutter | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $30,703 |
| 29 | Trb Dykema LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $28,505 |
| 30 | Hyline Farms LLC | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $28,177 |
| 31 | B & T Farms Inc | Gallatin Gateway, MT 59730 | $27,113 |
| 32 | Pete L Blanksma Estate | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $25,617 |
| 33 | Headwaters Farms Inc | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $24,707 |
| 34 | Middle Creek Farms | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $23,951 |
| 35 | J C Valley Farming Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $23,378 |
| 36 | Dyk & Sons Ld & Ctl | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $23,371 |
| 37 | Mcreynolds Ranch LLC | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $23,252 |
| 38 | Mitch Foth | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $22,717 |
| 39 | Robert Hofman | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $22,414 |
| 40 | Saddle Mountain Ranches | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $21,541 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf