Conservation Reserve Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 410
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $58,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ralph Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,275,107 |
2 | D B Kraft Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,960,745 |
3 | Neil Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,693,832 |
4 | Blackfeet Tribe | Browning, MT 59417 | $1,229,983 |
5 | James Edwards | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,050,645 |
6 | Mark Lewis | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $946,836 |
7 | Rick R Christopherson | Las Vegas, NV 89109 | $915,347 |
8 | Sutacres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $894,348 |
9 | Marvin G Kimmet | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $884,337 |
10 | Marias River Land & Livestock | Cascade, MT 59421 | $874,724 |
11 | Johnson-kraft Family Partnership | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $858,889 |
12 | John V Anderson Land & Cattle Inc | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $846,395 |
13 | Robert E Wellman Jr | Valier, MT 59486 | $837,340 |
14 | Joan Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $833,528 |
15 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $809,072 |
16 | Sidney J Anderson | Woodstock, GA 30189 | $782,520 |
17 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $773,586 |
18 | Susan Frederick | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $752,412 |
19 | Kenneth W Christopherson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $730,483 |
20 | Sheryle L Bittner | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $728,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>