Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fred N Volkman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $10,137 |
22 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,730 |
23 | Glen R Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $8,611 |
24 | Bert Guith | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,496 |
25 | Darrol R Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,482 |
26 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,391 |
27 | Chantry J Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,295 |
28 | Kara M Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,295 |
29 | Altenburg Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,189 |
30 | Liane Johnson Dba Lj Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,955 |
31 | Daniel S Barcus | Valier, MT 59486 | $4,687 |
32 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,354 |
33 | Marilyn J Perry | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,131 |
34 | Rodney W Perry | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,131 |
35 | Kevin John Connelly | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,470 |
36 | James Runningfisher | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,259 |
37 | Michael Koepke | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,176 |
38 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,673 |
39 | Koepke Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,517 |
40 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,437 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”