Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Glacier County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 167
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $1,458,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick Allan Hall | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $17,091 |
22 | Vincent Michael | Browning, MT 59417 | $15,790 |
23 | Richard Carlton Peterson | Browning, MT 59417 | $15,780 |
24 | Arnie Johnson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,779 |
25 | Kole Fitzpatrick | Browning, MT 59417 | $15,552 |
26 | Gilbert England | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,531 |
27 | Edward Mccauley | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,529 |
28 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,288 |
29 | Charlotte Barry | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $14,602 |
30 | J J & W Partnership | Choteau, MT 59422 | $13,421 |
31 | Mc Land & Cattle Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $13,038 |
32 | , | $12,967 | |
33 | Ross R Williams | Browning, MT 59417 | $12,316 |
34 | George G Kipp III | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $12,185 |
35 | Raines Farms LLC | Valier, MT 59486 | $11,531 |
36 | Alcinda S Barcus | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $11,331 |
37 | Daniel B Barcus | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $11,331 |
38 | Dennis A Fitzpatrick Jr | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $11,207 |
39 | Kevin John Connelly | Browning, MT 59417 | $11,142 |
40 | Barcus Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $11,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”