Conservation Reserve Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 410
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $58,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David J Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $443,799 |
42 | Barbara Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $443,391 |
43 | Tom R Johnson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $442,711 |
44 | Gaylen Sharp | Browning, MT 59417 | $426,424 |
45 | Gloria S Sundquist | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $414,402 |
46 | Jo Dee Devereaux | East Glacier Park, MT 59434 | $412,915 |
47 | William H Tweedy II | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $404,978 |
48 | Wayne Simonson Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $395,043 |
49 | Rick L Whitford | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $377,780 |
50 | Dan Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $353,530 |
51 | Robert Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $346,350 |
52 | Irma J Tweedy | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $345,309 |
53 | Roger R Walter | Browning, MT 59417 | $337,196 |
54 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $336,037 |
55 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $331,153 |
56 | Trail Coulee Farm Llp | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $331,058 |
57 | Russell Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $327,339 |
58 | Elmer Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $326,443 |
59 | Koepke Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $326,217 |
60 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $320,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”