Deficiency Payment in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 354
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $518,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,595 |
42 | Fred Johnson | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,572 |
43 | Kenneth L Proefrock Estate | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,546 |
44 | Joseph O Evans Est | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,459 |
45 | Little Flower Parish | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,375 |
46 | Boxwell Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,349 |
47 | Olson Revocable Trst | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $3,343 |
48 | William A Van Alstine | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $3,208 |
49 | Gaylen Sharp | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,117 |
50 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,098 |
51 | Robert G. Powell | Babb, MT 59411 | $3,021 |
52 | Glenn V Hegle Estate | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,938 |
53 | Tim Luedtke | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,928 |
54 | David Cooper | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,896 |
55 | William F Sharp | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,856 |
56 | Sidney J Anderson | Woodstock, GA 30189 | $2,836 |
57 | Leo Kimmet | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,821 |
58 | Patricia Boxwell | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,766 |
59 | Juletta Coleman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,761 |
60 | Glen R Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”