Direct Payment Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 542
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $37,726,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard L Swenson Family Farm Ptn | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $321,297 |
42 | Ramona Wellman | Browning, MT 59417 | $321,145 |
43 | C W Cooper Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $314,387 |
44 | Landslide Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $306,024 |
45 | Altenburg Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $297,163 |
46 | Cjc Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $294,483 |
47 | Little Rock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $290,361 |
48 | Liane Johnson Dba Lj Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $286,962 |
49 | Neil Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $285,644 |
50 | Carl E Sundquist | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $283,581 |
51 | Zona Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $277,950 |
52 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $264,841 |
53 | Wade Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $261,560 |
54 | Glen R Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $256,896 |
55 | Keven W Bradley | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $253,477 |
56 | Alan Mcalpine | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $250,661 |
57 | J & L Cattle | Saint Regis, MT 59866 | $248,910 |
58 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $243,230 |
59 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $241,333 |
60 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $238,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”