Market Loss Assistance Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 458
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $13,679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alan Mcalpine | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $89,925 |
42 | Bradford L Hanson | Corvallis, OR 97330 | $88,728 |
43 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $87,869 |
44 | Thomas A Simonson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $84,036 |
45 | // Del Wahl Estate | , 00000 | $82,697 |
46 | T Tom Tuma | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $82,133 |
47 | Julius Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,976 |
48 | Silver Dell Ranch Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,961 |
49 | West Rim Agriculture Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,747 |
50 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,357 |
51 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,000 |
52 | Gilham Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,000 |
53 | Harvey Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,000 |
54 | Cody Walburger | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $80,000 |
55 | Tytus T Coleman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $78,373 |
56 | Bradley Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $77,651 |
57 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $77,060 |
58 | Dan Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $76,775 |
59 | A & N Cattle Co LLC | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $76,645 |
60 | Goldie E Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $76,335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”