Loan Deficiency in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 407
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $9,563,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nancy Dusterhoff | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $45,239 |
62 | Mark T Suta | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $45,111 |
63 | E O Peterson Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $45,108 |
64 | Mike Dusterhoff | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $44,460 |
65 | Gt Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $43,671 |
66 | Zona Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $43,501 |
67 | Marilyn J Perry | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $43,464 |
68 | Rodney W Perry | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $43,464 |
69 | Tom R Johnson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $42,863 |
70 | Thomas A Simonson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $41,527 |
71 | William E Smrcka | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $41,308 |
72 | J E Tweedy | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $40,049 |
73 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $38,888 |
74 | Ken Dudley Estate | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $38,719 |
75 | Cindy Kimmet | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $38,719 |
76 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $36,544 |
77 | John H Weathered | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,520 |
78 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,498 |
79 | Irma Jean Smrcka | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,275 |
80 | David L Henderson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $33,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”