Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Glacier County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 180
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $2,567,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Diamond Box Livestock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $9,807 |
82 | Tom H Crawford | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $9,466 |
83 | Jay Vasboe | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $9,128 |
84 | Georgia Icenoggle | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $9,106 |
85 | Richard Allen Laverdure | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $9,076 |
86 | Eugene Kelly Edwards | Browning, MT 59417 | $8,562 |
87 | A Craig Ironpipe | Browning, MT 59417 | $8,476 |
88 | Frank Harrison III | Browning, MT 59417 | $8,422 |
89 | Jamie L Woldstad | Valier, MT 59486 | $8,175 |
90 | Whitford Livestock, LLC | Browning, MT 59417 | $8,151 |
91 | Yvonne Mae Augare | Valier, MT 59486 | $8,142 |
92 | Altenburg Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $8,122 |
93 | Turk Russell Cobell | Valier, MT 59486 | $8,064 |
94 | William A Powell | Babb, MT 59411 | $7,733 |
95 | Jay Stgoddard | Browning, MT 59417 | $7,676 |
96 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $7,294 |
97 | , | $7,057 | |
98 | Borderline Ranch Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $6,811 |
99 | Russell Aiken | Valier, MT 59486 | $6,737 |
100 | Lavada Jean Pilling | Browning, MT 59417 | $6,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”