Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 264
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $3,375,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Lillian Joyce Hibbs | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,202 |
162 | Nelse Stgoddard | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,197 |
163 | Richard Carlton Peterson | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,194 |
164 | Greg Louis | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,170 |
165 | James Karl Andrew Heptner | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,123 |
166 | Doris Old Person Estate | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,057 |
167 | John Raymond Murray | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,004 |
168 | Brenda F Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,001 |
169 | Dr Ethel Ann Connelly | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,769 |
170 | James Spottedeagle | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $2,768 |
171 | Casey Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $2,763 |
172 | Julius Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,741 |
173 | Alcinda S Barcus | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,716 |
174 | David Parsons | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,685 |
175 | Thedis B Crowe | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,628 |
176 | Kylan Ray Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,628 |
177 | Powder River Cattle Co LLC | Helena, MT 59602 | $2,611 |
178 | Morris St Goddard | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,610 |
179 | Ronald Lee Johnson | East Glacier Park, MT 59434 | $2,575 |
180 | Marvin Crawford | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $2,558 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”