Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 96
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $325,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William Devereaux Estate | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,500 |
22 | James R Kennedy | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,500 |
23 | Ramona Wellman | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,402 |
24 | June Tatsey | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,349 |
25 | Vincent Michael | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,295 |
26 | Clifford Guith | Loveland, CO 80538 | $3,213 |
27 | Edward Connelly II | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,146 |
28 | Lane Kennedy | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,131 |
29 | Joseph L Boggs Estate | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $3,101 |
30 | Eugene Christopher Blackman Sr | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,096 |
31 | James Running Fisher Sr Estate | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,061 |
32 | Patrick C Thomas | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,034 |
33 | James Runningfisher | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,005 |
34 | Steven R Fenner | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,935 |
35 | Johnson Walter D & Lois D Revocab | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $2,923 |
36 | George Kicking Woman | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,769 |
37 | Mark Keller | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,360 |
38 | Rick Reagan | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,341 |
39 | Ted W Hoyt | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,313 |
40 | Carmelita Hoyt | Browning, MT 59417 | $2,133 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”