Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | R L Johnson Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $125,000 |
2 | C9 Cattle LLC | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $125,000 |
3 | Barcus Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $85,943 |
4 | Cutting Edge Farms LLC | Joplin, MT 59531 | $84,964 |
5 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $54,970 |
6 | Gilham Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $38,028 |
7 | Little Rock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $36,447 |
8 | Lon Peterson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,174 |
9 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $32,443 |
10 | South Milk River Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $32,359 |
11 | Whistling Swan Farms LLC | Browning, MT 59417 | $27,733 |
12 | Todd E Zimbelman | Brady, MT 59416 | $21,187 |
13 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $19,713 |
14 | William Larry Whitford | Browning, MT 59417 | $19,144 |
15 | Mark Lewis | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $19,051 |
16 | Stanley Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $18,798 |
17 | Miles D Lewis | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,548 |
18 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $14,770 |
19 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $14,216 |
20 | Casey Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $14,199 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>