Total Emergency Relief Program in Glacier County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $1,225,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $308,428 |
2 | Gilham Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $216,462 |
3 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $169,592 |
4 | Silver Dell Ranch Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $136,049 |
5 | Harvey Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $125,000 |
6 | Casey Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $39,919 |
7 | Michael J Loring | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $31,978 |
8 | Joan Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $27,940 |
9 | Glacier Farms Inc | Valier, MT 59486 | $16,554 |
10 | Eric A Morrisett | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,086 |
11 | Kate M Morrisett | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,086 |
12 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $14,187 |
13 | Triangle Land & Livestock Co Inc | Browning, MT 59417 | $13,855 |
14 | Daniel S Barcus | Valier, MT 59486 | $12,030 |
15 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $11,625 |
16 | Michael Koepke | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $7,859 |
17 | Fred N Volkman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $7,529 |
18 | D & E Haynes Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,339 |
19 | Jace L Kimmet | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $6,128 |
20 | William L Hoffman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>