Total Conservation Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 70
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $585,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $10,031 |
| 22 | Alva & Sons Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $9,927 |
| 23 | Barcus Ranch | Browning, MT 59417 | $9,465 |
| 24 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $8,834 |
| 25 | Jesse J Heavyrunner | Browning, MT 59417 | $8,080 |
| 26 | Joann Alstad Karhu | Clancy, MT 59634 | $7,897 |
| 27 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $7,102 |
| 28 | Sheryle L Bittner | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,601 |
| 29 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,223 |
| 30 | Kathy Ann Maggi | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,210 |
| 31 | Susan Berger | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $5,190 |
| 32 | Kylan Ray Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,975 |
| 33 | Faye Hoyt | Browning, MT 59417 | $4,509 |
| 34 | Fred J Volkman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,492 |
| 35 | Judith Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,323 |
| 36 | Silver Dell Ranch Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,310 |
| 37 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,274 |
| 38 | Grace Ann Smith | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,091 |
| 39 | Rock Gobert | Browning, MT 59417 | $3,743 |
| 40 | Somporn Reagan | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $3,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf