Farm Subsidy information
Granite County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Granite County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 82
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Granite County, Montana totaled $1,090,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Douglas A Buxbaum - Dba Smart Creek Ranch | Missoula, MT 59808 | $91,002 |
2 | Jensen Ranch Co | Hall, MT 59837 | $69,205 |
3 | Patricia C Bignell | Hall, MT 59837 | $54,078 |
4 | Johnson Tuning Fork Ranch | Hall, MT 59837 | $50,842 |
5 | Rock Creek Land & Cattle Ranch LLC | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $48,527 |
6 | Skinner Ranch Seedstock LLC | Hall, MT 59837 | $42,648 |
7 | William Dingwall Company | Drummond, MT 59832 | $42,220 |
8 | Edward A Dallaserra | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $41,495 |
9 | Rocking Chair Ranch Inc | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $38,655 |
10 | Timothy Hans Luthje | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $34,355 |
11 | Bohrnsen Land & Cattle Co | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $31,630 |
12 | Marshall Creek Ranch Inc | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $29,398 |
13 | Open Cross Ranch Inc | Hall, MT 59837 | $28,008 |
14 | Verlanic Ranch LLC | Drummond, MT 59832 | $27,092 |
15 | J Thomas Sanders | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $25,169 |
16 | Sunrise Livestock LLC | Hall, MT 59837 | $24,956 |
17 | Neel's Angus LLC | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $22,474 |
18 | Bruce Wight | Hall, MT 59837 | $19,195 |
19 | Charles P Parke | Drummond, MT 59832 | $18,518 |
20 | Mcgowan Ranch Llp | Drummond, MT 59832 | $15,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>