Total Commodity Programs in Hill County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 898
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $18,797,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hansen Grain Co | Gildford, MT 59525 | $91,281 |
42 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $91,212 |
43 | Greytak Grain Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $89,585 |
44 | Tollefson Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $88,422 |
45 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $88,212 |
46 | Hockett Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $88,054 |
47 | Daniel Land & Livestock Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $87,624 |
48 | Thiel Farms | Havre, MT 59501 | $86,676 |
49 | Amos Enterprises | Havre, MT 59501 | $85,539 |
50 | Barbie Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $84,362 |
51 | C & M Warren Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $82,872 |
52 | Ole Warren & Sons Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $81,274 |
53 | Jerome Pester Farms Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $80,837 |
54 | Dale Miller Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $80,378 |
55 | Rah-kee Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $79,824 |
56 | Mud Lake Grain | Havre, MT 59501 | $79,732 |
57 | Prairie View Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $78,098 |
58 | L M D Corporation | Gildford, MT 59525 | $75,427 |
59 | D B & J Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $75,202 |
60 | Rigg Farm Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $75,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”