Farm Subsidy information
Hill County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Hill County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,031
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $25,681,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | S W & Crew | Havre, MT 59501 | $103,342 |
| 22 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $97,740 |
| 23 | Doug Crabtree | Havre, MT 59501 | $97,677 |
| 24 | Hansen Grain Co | Gildford, MT 59525 | $97,081 |
| 25 | Cherry Coulee Partnership | Havre, MT 59501 | $92,389 |
| 26 | G & D Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $91,473 |
| 27 | Dry Fork Farms Tribal Corporation | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $89,285 |
| 28 | L M D Corporation | Gildford, MT 59525 | $88,888 |
| 29 | Tew Place Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $84,633 |
| 30 | Karl Verploegen Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $84,131 |
| 31 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $83,925 |
| 32 | Catfish Farms Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $83,404 |
| 33 | Amos Enterprises | Havre, MT 59501 | $82,313 |
| 34 | Telemark Grain Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $82,237 |
| 35 | Nourish Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $81,651 |
| 36 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $80,588 |
| 37 | Mak Farms | Havre, MT 59501 | $80,312 |
| 38 | Dale Miller Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $79,246 |
| 39 | Trevor G Wolery | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $79,018 |
| 40 | Hansen Wheat Farms | Gildford, MT 59525 | $74,639 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf