Farm Subsidy information
Hill County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $775,717,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kaercher Grain Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,476,605 |
62 | Mccormick Farms Inc | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $1,455,216 |
63 | Pester Brothers | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,446,763 |
64 | G & G Farms | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,430,923 |
65 | Hal C J Hanson | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,428,861 |
66 | The Brown Co | Hingham, MT 59528 | $1,425,248 |
67 | Peterson Grain & Cattle Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,414,435 |
68 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,410,445 |
69 | Steven White | Hingham, MT 59528 | $1,401,645 |
70 | Wildhorse Trail Farming Co Inc | Billings, MT 59106 | $1,401,084 |
71 | Dry Land Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,393,533 |
72 | Meland Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,388,855 |
73 | Richard Velk | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,383,975 |
74 | Bart Bitz Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,381,709 |
75 | Spinler Farms Co | Hingham, MT 59528 | $1,377,946 |
76 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $1,376,200 |
77 | Spring Coulee Grain Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,357,348 |
78 | Scattered Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,354,281 |
79 | Barbie Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $1,338,110 |
80 | R Land Inc | Stanford, MT 59479 | $1,334,873 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”