Total Commodity Programs in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,136
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $317,666,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Prairie Sun Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $834,235 |
82 | Joseph Hans Verploegen | Havre, MT 59501 | $823,645 |
83 | A J G Farms Inc | Lakeside, MT 59922 | $820,457 |
84 | Vosen Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $818,927 |
85 | Triple K Partnership | Gildford, MT 59525 | $812,808 |
86 | Scattered Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $810,723 |
87 | Mark Alan Aspevig | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $810,295 |
88 | Spring Coulee Farms Inc | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $809,543 |
89 | Prairie View Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $804,636 |
90 | Hinebauch Farms | Havre, MT 59501 | $796,732 |
91 | Hal C J Hanson | Havre, MT 59501 | $786,303 |
92 | C S D Farms Inc | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $786,157 |
93 | Jerome Pester Farms Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $782,105 |
94 | Purdy & Son Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $778,600 |
95 | Horinek Farms Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $775,440 |
96 | C T Farms | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $773,796 |
97 | G & R Land & Cattle Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $768,080 |
98 | Daniel Land & Livestock Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $767,455 |
99 | Stevenson Land Co | Gildford, MT 59525 | $767,318 |
100 | Brian C. Wilson Inc. | Havre, MT 59501 | $754,151 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”