Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Judith Basin County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 246
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Judith Basin County, Montana totaled $6,368,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sanna Skelton | Geyser, MT 59447 | $65,946 |
22 | Wertheimer H Inc | Hobson, MT 59452 | $65,889 |
23 | Wertheimer A Inc | Hobson, MT 59452 | $65,889 |
24 | Gale A Harlow | Geyser, MT 59447 | $65,674 |
25 | Bruce Neumann | Geyser, MT 59447 | $63,619 |
26 | Daniel Flugge | Hobson, MT 59452 | $59,762 |
27 | Jeremy K Grove | Moccasin, MT 59462 | $56,310 |
28 | Hughes Newford Co | Stanford, MT 59479 | $54,923 |
29 | Sandmeyer Ranches Inc | Geyser, MT 59447 | $53,536 |
30 | Hughes Livestock Co | Stanford, MT 59479 | $52,519 |
31 | Jesse M Rust | Moccasin, MT 59462 | $52,163 |
32 | Merrimac Cattle Co | Geyser, MT 59447 | $50,679 |
33 | Robin R Stevenson | Hobson, MT 59452 | $50,492 |
34 | Robert Lee Mccray Jr | Geyser, MT 59447 | $47,951 |
35 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $44,114 |
36 | M P Livestock Trust | Stanford, MT 59479 | $43,289 |
37 | Dustin R Probert | Geyser, MT 59447 | $42,940 |
38 | Anderson, Myrtle E Dba South Peak Angus Ranch | Geyser, MT 59447 | $41,811 |
39 | Bing K Schmitt | Stanford, MT 59479 | $41,531 |
40 | James A Dye | Stanford, MT 59479 | $41,401 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”