Farm Subsidy information
Judith Basin County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Judith Basin County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 359
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Judith Basin County, Montana totaled $9,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Travis A Berg | Stanford, MT 59479 | $41,363 |
62 | Merrimac Cattle Co | Geyser, MT 59447 | $40,252 |
63 | Dan Annala | Geyser, MT 59447 | $39,554 |
64 | Lois M Von Bergen | Moccasin, MT 59462 | $38,965 |
65 | R Charles Hill | Geyser, MT 59447 | $36,651 |
66 | Pat Ward | Denton, MT 59430 | $36,111 |
67 | Beau Brian Smith | Stanford, MT 59479 | $36,051 |
68 | Marvin J Mauws | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $35,683 |
69 | William Metcalf | Stanford, MT 59479 | $35,368 |
70 | Lynn Grain & Livestock Inc | Coffee Creek, MT 59424 | $35,243 |
71 | T Lazy T Ranch Inc | Hobson, MT 59452 | $34,782 |
72 | Derks Brothers Grain & Cattle Inc | Denton, MT 59430 | $34,781 |
73 | Hughes Newford Co | Stanford, MT 59479 | $33,519 |
74 | Kevin M Melton | Denton, MT 59430 | $33,422 |
75 | Jean Anderson Dba Robert And Jean Anderson Ranch | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $32,695 |
76 | John William Flanagan Estate | Hobson, MT 59452 | $32,045 |
77 | David R Dover | Buffalo, MT 59418 | $31,922 |
78 | Wade A Kynett | Moccasin, MT 59462 | $31,905 |
79 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $31,818 |
80 | Dennis A Wichman | Moccasin, MT 59462 | $31,714 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”