Farm Subsidy information
Lewis and Clark County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Lewis and Clark County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 137
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lewis and Clark County, Montana totaled $2,349,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Arthur D Thompson | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $26,542 |
22 | James T Weisner | Augusta, MT 59410 | $25,164 |
23 | Bignell Angus Ranch Inc | Avon, MT 59713 | $23,547 |
24 | Charles F Melaney | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $23,436 |
25 | Richard & Mary Sampsen Jv | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $22,293 |
26 | Barrett Land & Livestock Co | Augusta, MT 59410 | $21,979 |
27 | Carlson Ranch Limited Partnership | Clancy, MT 59634 | $21,563 |
28 | William G Gehring | Helena, MT 59602 | $21,453 |
29 | 4 Lazy B Cattle Company | Canyon Creek, MT 59633 | $20,199 |
30 | Cobb Charolais Ranch Inc | Augusta, MT 59410 | $20,042 |
31 | Settle Ranch Co Inc | Canyon Creek, MT 59633 | $19,025 |
32 | Prickly Pear Simmental Ranch Llp | Helena, MT 59602 | $18,920 |
33 | Fitzsimmons Land Company LLC | Canyon Creek, MT 59633 | $18,491 |
34 | Alexander J Dooling | Helena, MT 59602 | $18,414 |
35 | John Wilson | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $17,357 |
36 | Carol A Troy | Augusta, MT 59410 | $16,515 |
37 | Betty L Murphy | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $16,189 |
38 | Goff's Farm Inc | Augusta, MT 59410 | $14,793 |
39 | H T S Inc | Helena, MT 59602 | $14,046 |
40 | John Novotny | Helena, MT 59602 | $13,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”