Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Lewis and Clark County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 177
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Lewis and Clark County, Montana totaled $1,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | R V Ranch Co | Helena, MT 59601 | $10,706 |
42 | Mark E Young | Augusta, MT 59410 | $10,704 |
43 | Elk Creek Colony Inc | Augusta, MT 59410 | $10,679 |
44 | Weisner Ranch | Augusta, MT 59410 | $10,292 |
45 | Novak Dairy Inc | Helena, MT 59602 | $10,075 |
46 | Gehring Ranch Corporation | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $9,433 |
47 | Gordon Young | Augusta, MT 59410 | $9,426 |
48 | Baldy Mountain Ranch Inc | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $8,807 |
49 | William J Foster Jr | East Helena, MT 59635 | $8,658 |
50 | Rick Ripley | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $8,416 |
51 | David R Baum | Helena, MT 59602 | $6,999 |
52 | Leroy P Belling | Arock, OR 97902 | $6,314 |
53 | William G Gehring | Helena, MT 59602 | $6,261 |
54 | Don Converse | Augusta, MT 59410 | $6,089 |
55 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $5,558 |
56 | Ken Diehl & Sons LLC | East Helena, MT 59635 | $5,526 |
57 | John Novotny | Helena, MT 59602 | $5,427 |
58 | Russell W Weingartner | Helena, MT 59602 | $5,389 |
59 | Alexander J Dooling | Helena, MT 59602 | $5,225 |
60 | William J Foster | East Helena, MT 59635 | $5,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”