Market Loss Assistance Program in Lewis and Clark County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 173
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Lewis and Clark County, Montana totaled $1,604,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Roger P King | Augusta, MT 59410 | $944 |
102 | Shawn Toney | Helena, MT 59602 | $933 |
103 | Earl R Baker | Helena, MT 59602 | $841 |
104 | Rick Justice | East Helena, MT 59635 | $779 |
105 | J Bar E Sod Farm | Helena, MT 59602 | $762 |
106 | Shane Moos | Helena, MT 59602 | $660 |
107 | Eastgate Water & Sewer Assoc | East Helena, MT 59635 | $642 |
108 | Lone Pine Land Inc | Augusta, MT 59410 | $636 |
109 | Boyd Hicken | Helena, MT 59604 | $636 |
110 | Quin Rasmussen | East Helena, MT 59635 | $635 |
111 | Viola Nelson | Helena, MT 59602 | $635 |
112 | Richard Wolstein | Helena, MT 59602 | $631 |
113 | Nancy Matheson | Helena, MT 59601 | $616 |
114 | Grady Livestock Co | Canyon Creek, MT 59633 | $523 |
115 | Ron M Johnson | Helena, MT 59604 | $517 |
116 | Settle Ranch Co Inc | Canyon Creek, MT 59633 | $513 |
117 | Lincoln Lewis And Clark Sewer Dis | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $508 |
118 | David L Pierson | East Helena, MT 59635 | $490 |
119 | Gerald W Wearley | Augusta, MT 59410 | $465 |
120 | Ray Daigen | Helena, MT 59602 | $463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”