Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Liberty County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 239
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $2,189,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick Harmon | Chester, MT 59522 | $20,805 |
22 | Hawks Angus Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $19,670 |
23 | North Field Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $19,415 |
24 | Edward V Cole | Chester, MT 59522 | $18,280 |
25 | Helen Wickum | Chester, MT 59522 | $18,177 |
26 | Basin Farm Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $17,907 |
27 | Thomas Z Engstrom | Whitlash, MT 59545 | $16,816 |
28 | Hi-line Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $16,105 |
29 | Thompson Livestock Inc | Whitlash, MT 59545 | $15,525 |
30 | W3 Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $14,452 |
31 | Btd Ranch Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $14,202 |
32 | Wicks Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $13,760 |
33 | Jake R Fritz | Chester, MT 59522 | $12,916 |
34 | C & A Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $12,107 |
35 | Rick Belcher | Whitlash, MT 59545 | $12,064 |
36 | Basin Coulee Cattle Co | Ledger, MT 59456 | $11,448 |
37 | Van Dessel & Sons | Joplin, MT 59531 | $10,936 |
38 | Cb Hawks Land And Cattle Co | Galata, MT 59444 | $10,883 |
39 | Good And Saxton Ranch | Chester, MT 59522 | $10,670 |
40 | Clifford D Lybeck | Joplin, MT 59531 | $10,421 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”