Total Commodity Programs in Liberty County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 244
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $4,244,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pugsley Cattle Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $34,678 |
42 | K J K Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $34,587 |
43 | Craig Broadhurst | Ledger, MT 59456 | $33,605 |
44 | S & J Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $33,276 |
45 | Corral Creek Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $32,850 |
46 | Justin Wickum | Chester, MT 59522 | $31,441 |
47 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $31,297 |
48 | K & G Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $30,539 |
49 | Michael J Nelson | Chester, MT 59522 | $30,372 |
50 | Mc Land & Cattle Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $30,120 |
51 | Steven Joseph May | Joplin, MT 59531 | $29,674 |
52 | Van Dessel Land & Equipment | Joplin, MT 59531 | $29,006 |
53 | Rocking K O Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $28,924 |
54 | Bradee Henry Hawks | Chester, MT 59522 | $25,821 |
55 | Grammar Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $25,538 |
56 | Eic Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $25,506 |
57 | , | $25,373 | |
58 | J & L Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $25,288 |
59 | Ish Incorporated | Chester, MT 59522 | $25,050 |
60 | Duncan Ranch Company | Joplin, MT 59531 | $24,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”