Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Liberty County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 558
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $35,112,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | K Wheat Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $138,881 |
82 | Corral Creek Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $138,233 |
83 | L & C Fossen Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $136,731 |
84 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $134,651 |
85 | Sage Creek Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $133,416 |
86 | K & G Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $126,204 |
87 | Elk Ridge Farms Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $124,331 |
88 | Phillips Land Co Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $121,732 |
89 | Hi-line Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $119,019 |
90 | 97 Homesteads Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $118,050 |
91 | E Z Farms Ltd | Chester, MT 59522 | $117,613 |
92 | Robert A Hurley | Ledger, MT 59456 | $117,243 |
93 | North Field Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,939 |
94 | Lyders Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,438 |
95 | Lowberg Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,015 |
96 | J & S Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $113,692 |
97 | Jv Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $111,082 |
98 | Tyler Kolstad | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $110,344 |
99 | Jack Seidlitz Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $108,551 |
100 | Thorson Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $108,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”