Market Loss Assistance Program in Liberty County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 611
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $16,817,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Thorson Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $48,506 |
122 | Scotch Coulee Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $48,422 |
123 | Wild Rose Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $48,422 |
124 | Mk Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $48,172 |
125 | Nelson Spraying Service Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $47,225 |
126 | R And F Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $46,561 |
127 | Tracy Nelson | Joplin, MT 59531 | $46,371 |
128 | Cedric- Kolstad Fami Kolstad | Mesa, AZ 85203 | $45,962 |
129 | Kdg Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $45,828 |
130 | Russel Wicks Estate | Ledger, MT 59456 | $45,761 |
131 | Lillian D Fritz | Galata, MT 59444 | $45,082 |
132 | Van Dessel Sunrise Farms Partnerh | Joplin, MT 59531 | $44,624 |
133 | //dahinden Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $44,284 |
134 | William H Earl Jr | Chester, MT 59522 | $44,067 |
135 | Larry L Hendrickson | Chester, MT 59522 | $43,386 |
136 | Knaws Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $42,645 |
137 | Donald A Schaefer | Chester, MT 59522 | $42,446 |
138 | Rhonda Pimley | Chester, MT 59522 | $42,035 |
139 | Sylvia Jensen | Chester, MT 59522 | $42,022 |
140 | Robert A Hurley | Ledger, MT 59456 | $41,288 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”