Farm Subsidy information
Liberty County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Liberty County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 480
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $20,442,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & L Farms | Joplin, MT 59531 | $141,440 |
22 | Violett Farms Inc | Lothair, MT 59461 | $137,936 |
23 | 4j Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $137,187 |
24 | M & V Farm And Ranch Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $131,047 |
25 | Elk Ridge Farms Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $128,725 |
26 | Brian May Farms Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $127,163 |
27 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $125,952 |
28 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $125,653 |
29 | Heydon Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $121,958 |
30 | Basin Farm Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $118,786 |
31 | Hanag | Inverness, MT 59530 | $118,423 |
32 | Liberty Colony Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $118,194 |
33 | Wicks Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,191 |
34 | Paragon Grain Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $110,809 |
35 | Henke Bros Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $110,035 |
36 | Wayne Kolstad Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $106,164 |
37 | Robert Henke & Sons Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $96,600 |
38 | 97 Homesteads Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $94,213 |
39 | Black Coulee Land And Cattle | Joplin, MT 59531 | $93,268 |
40 | K & G Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $90,456 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”