Market Loss Assistance Program in Liberty County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 611
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $16,817,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | K J K Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $130,216 |
22 | Colbry Farms | Marion, MT 59925 | $130,143 |
23 | Pioneer Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $128,074 |
24 | Double L Incorporated | Chester, MT 59522 | $126,993 |
25 | Black Coulee Land And Cattle | Joplin, MT 59531 | $126,351 |
26 | Hadford Farm Partnership | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $126,034 |
27 | John Kammerzell Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $125,992 |
28 | Mcclellan Farm | Joplin, MT 59531 | $125,119 |
29 | Philip A Nordstrom | Chester, MT 59522 | $123,494 |
30 | Flat Acre Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $122,968 |
31 | Van Dessel & Sons | Joplin, MT 59531 | $121,903 |
32 | Marias Ridge Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $121,111 |
33 | Hull Bros Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $120,430 |
34 | Laird Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $118,734 |
35 | Harmon Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,133 |
36 | Kolstad & Kolstad Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $114,010 |
37 | L & W Hi Line Farms Partnership | Joplin, MT 59531 | $113,972 |
38 | Hofer Brothers | Helena, MT 59604 | $112,366 |
39 | Mattson Bros Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $111,760 |
40 | William H Skinner Trust - William H Skinner | Lothair, MT 59461 | $111,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”