Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Liberty County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 381
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $9,513,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Skari Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $94,914 |
22 | R & B Farms | Joplin, MT 59531 | $91,017 |
23 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $90,422 |
24 | Hanag | Inverness, MT 59530 | $90,393 |
25 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $87,520 |
26 | Brian May Farms Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $85,386 |
27 | Sage Creek Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $84,773 |
28 | K & G Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $84,492 |
29 | S & J Farms | Chester, MT 59522 | $84,210 |
30 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $83,256 |
31 | Mcclellan Farm | Joplin, MT 59531 | $79,209 |
32 | Montana Prairie Ranches Inc | Lothair, MT 59461 | $78,122 |
33 | L & C Fossen Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $77,776 |
34 | 97 Homesteads Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $77,333 |
35 | Robert Henke & Sons Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $76,885 |
36 | Eagle Creek Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $75,310 |
37 | North Field Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $74,864 |
38 | Black Coulee Land And Cattle | Joplin, MT 59531 | $74,197 |
39 | Hi-line Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $73,169 |
40 | Basin Farm Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $72,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”