Total Commodity Programs in Liberty County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 452
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Liberty County, Montana totaled $13,032,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | 4j Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $135,263 |
22 | R & L Farms | Joplin, MT 59531 | $134,428 |
23 | M & V Farm And Ranch Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $131,047 |
24 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $125,653 |
25 | Heydon Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $121,958 |
26 | Elk Ridge Farms Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $120,866 |
27 | Basin Farm Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $118,786 |
28 | Hanag | Inverness, MT 59530 | $118,423 |
29 | Liberty Colony Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $118,194 |
30 | Wicks Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $116,191 |
31 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $115,972 |
32 | Brian May Farms Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $115,271 |
33 | Henke Bros Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $110,035 |
34 | Paragon Grain Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $109,033 |
35 | Wayne Kolstad Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $106,164 |
36 | Robert Henke & Sons Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $95,978 |
37 | 97 Homesteads Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $94,213 |
38 | Black Coulee Land And Cattle | Joplin, MT 59531 | $93,268 |
39 | K & G Ranch Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $90,456 |
40 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $89,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”