Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in McCone County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 183
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in McCone County, Montana totaled $849,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hubing Ranch Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $12,216 |
22 | William J Brody | Circle, MT 59215 | $11,447 |
23 | James B Twitchell | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $11,416 |
24 | Gibbs Livestock Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $11,194 |
25 | Jensen Bros Of Circle Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $10,744 |
26 | Yarger Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $10,368 |
27 | Shannon Rosaaen | Circle, MT 59215 | $10,359 |
28 | James W Gibbs | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $9,676 |
29 | Larry D Arnston | Circle, MT 59215 | $9,537 |
30 | Prairie Elk Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $9,468 |
31 | Cody Haber | Circle, MT 59215 | $8,650 |
32 | Jared Kountz | Brockway, MT 59214 | $8,447 |
33 | Scott Neubauer | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $8,446 |
34 | Melissa Kountz | Brockway, MT 59214 | $8,440 |
35 | Eissinger Land & Cattle Co | Brockway, MT 59214 | $8,327 |
36 | Murphy Ranch Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $8,273 |
37 | Quick Ranch LLC | Circle, MT 59215 | $7,996 |
38 | Darlyne Dascher | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $7,462 |
39 | Jack Nickels- Jack W Nickels Trust | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $7,451 |
40 | Robert E Walden | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $7,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”