Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in McCone County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 332
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in McCone County, Montana totaled $2,989,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James W Gibbs | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $35,142 |
22 | White Ranch Mccone County Inc | Ronan, MT 59864 | $34,874 |
23 | Gibbs Ranch Partnership | Circle, MT 59215 | $34,620 |
24 | Bernis Taylor | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $34,255 |
25 | Betty J Collins | Roundup, MT 59072 | $30,293 |
26 | Wittkopp Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $30,180 |
27 | Schmidt Herefords Inc | Brockway, MT 59214 | $30,156 |
28 | Lyle E Nelson Trust Agreement | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $30,007 |
29 | Duane White | Circle, MT 59215 | $29,819 |
30 | David Hinnaland | Circle, MT 59215 | $29,572 |
31 | Eissinger Land & Cattle Co | Brockway, MT 59214 | $29,320 |
32 | Sandstone Cattle Co Inc | Joliet, MT 59041 | $28,287 |
33 | Darrell W Garoutte | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $28,050 |
34 | Breitbach Bros Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $25,855 |
35 | Kountz Ranch Inc | Brockway, MT 59214 | $25,357 |
36 | Lone Pine Ranch Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $23,631 |
37 | Shannon Vine | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $23,603 |
38 | James E Kirkland | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $22,916 |
39 | J-bar 9 Ranch Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $22,841 |
40 | Nick Mothershead | Brockway, MT 59214 | $22,756 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”