Farm Subsidy information
Madison County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Madison County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 150
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madison County, Montana totaled $2,406,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry D Mehlhoff | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $18,206 |
22 | Gilman Ih Cattle Co | Alder, MT 59710 | $17,587 |
23 | Kristi G Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $17,179 |
24 | Peterson Ranch LLC | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $16,756 |
25 | Garrisons Big Hole River Ranch Inc | Glen, MT 59732 | $16,745 |
26 | Melvin David Maichel | Harrison, MT 59735 | $16,155 |
27 | Sitz Angus Farm Ltd | Harrison, MT 59735 | $15,589 |
28 | , | $15,225 | |
29 | Mark W Boyd | Alder, MT 59710 | $15,185 |
30 | Rebish & Konen Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $15,141 |
31 | Point Of Rocks Angus Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $14,859 |
32 | Larry J Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $14,316 |
33 | Ruby Dell Ranch | Alder, MT 59710 | $14,255 |
34 | Rick Sandru | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $13,602 |
35 | Brandon Gregory Brooks | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $13,598 |
36 | Helle Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $13,315 |
37 | Larry Martin Etal Ptrs Heart L Ranch | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $13,139 |
38 | Horse Creek Hay & Cattle LLC | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $12,798 |
39 | Alton Ranch Inc | Ennis, MT 59729 | $12,686 |
40 | Elser & Sons Ranch Inc | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $11,727 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”