Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Madison County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 143
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Madison County, Montana totaled $939,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William R Grose | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $5,858 |
42 | Kenneth W Glaus | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $5,609 |
43 | Linda Glaus | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $5,591 |
44 | Glaus LLC | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $5,512 |
45 | Miller Cattle Co | Alder, MT 59710 | $5,416 |
46 | Jaime A Wood | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $5,228 |
47 | Wmr Livestock LLC | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $5,117 |
48 | George Brian Dickerson | Mcalister, MT 59740 | $5,080 |
49 | Elser & Sons Ranch Inc | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $4,969 |
50 | C Lazy R Ranch LLC | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $4,888 |
51 | Bruce H Bacon | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $4,646 |
52 | Mike Stender | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $4,515 |
53 | 7 V LLC Dba Goggins Ranch | Ennis, MT 59729 | $4,438 |
54 | Edward J Collins | Harrison, MT 59735 | $4,436 |
55 | Collin R Rice | Ennis, MT 59729 | $4,183 |
56 | Brett L Owens | Mc Allister, MT 59740 | $4,037 |
57 | Kyle W Glaus | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $4,023 |
58 | Larry Martin Etal Ptrs Heart L Ranch | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $3,887 |
59 | Kevin Boltz | Ennis, MT 59729 | $3,810 |
60 | Troy W Martin | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $3,805 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”