Direct Payment Program in Madison County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 202
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Madison County, Montana totaled $4,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronald And Georgia Nye Jv | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $12,216 |
62 | Ashcraft Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $12,134 |
63 | David Ashcraft | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $11,899 |
64 | Sauerbier Ranches Inc | Alder, MT 59710 | $11,362 |
65 | Wanda Kemper | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $11,317 |
66 | Martin Brothers Farm | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $11,226 |
67 | Miller Cattle Co | Alder, MT 59710 | $10,924 |
68 | Dale And Catherine Grose Jv | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $10,380 |
69 | Calvin Smith Trust | Harrison, MT 59735 | $10,244 |
70 | Jennifer M Sabo | Harrison, MT 59735 | $9,814 |
71 | Daniel S Ohs | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $9,728 |
72 | Ronald E Nye | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $9,306 |
73 | Van Nice Angus Ranch LLC | Hanna, OK 74845 | $9,047 |
74 | Elser & Sons Ranch Inc | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $8,985 |
75 | Julian Norville | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $8,953 |
76 | Charles Miller Jr | Silver Star, MT 59751 | $8,900 |
77 | Kenneth W Glaus | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $8,815 |
78 | Linda Glaus | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $8,815 |
79 | David G Hargrove | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $8,761 |
80 | Walter Morris | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $8,642 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”