Farm Subsidy information
Madison County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Madison County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 199
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madison County, Montana totaled $3,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ruby Dell Ranch | Alder, MT 59710 | $36,222 |
22 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $35,596 |
23 | Carol M Patrick | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $35,586 |
24 | Melvin David Maichel | Harrison, MT 59735 | $35,072 |
25 | Dell Bacon Ranch Company | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $34,099 |
26 | Peterson Ranch LLC | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $33,894 |
27 | Pleasant View Ranch LLC | Harrison, MT 59735 | $32,368 |
28 | Christopher Madrid | Harrison, MT 59735 | $30,878 |
29 | Silver Spring Ranch | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $30,480 |
30 | Broksle Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $29,146 |
31 | Garrisons Big Hole River Ranch Inc | Glen, MT 59732 | $28,943 |
32 | Alton Ranch Inc | Ennis, MT 59729 | $28,126 |
33 | Seven Up Bar Ranch Inc. | Melrose, MT 59743 | $27,692 |
34 | Kristi G Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $27,518 |
35 | Larry J Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $27,518 |
36 | Glaus LLC | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $27,434 |
37 | Dry Hills Farm LLC | Harrison, MT 59735 | $27,230 |
38 | Leif Funston | Ennis, MT 59729 | $26,391 |
39 | Paul Banks | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $25,823 |
40 | Carlson Land And Cattle LLC | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $21,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”