Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $3,355,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Rostad & Rostad, IncBozeman, MT 59715$41,146
22Bar Z RanchWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$37,745
23Crazy M Ranch Lmt PartHarlowton, MT 59036$37,581
24Higgins BrosRingling, MT 59642$37,371
25Lind Bros LLCWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$33,637
26Kiff Ranch IncRingling, MT 59642$31,620
27Down T Livestock LLCHobson, MT 59452$27,045
28Barbara RussellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$26,950
29Bert O WilliamsWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$26,462
30Berg Ranch Co IncMartinsdale, MT 59053$25,850
31Thad A HereimWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$24,247
32Mcguire RanchesWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$23,503
33Brian L BodellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$19,800
34Flying S RchWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$19,635
35Stephen G BuckinghamWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$19,221
36William W GaltWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$19,195
37Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$18,369
38Ken OgleWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$17,733
39Barbara Hereim Dba Hereim RanchMartinsdale, MT 59053$17,205
40Ben HurwitzWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$16,445

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag