Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $6,795,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2023
21Holmstrom Land Co IncWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$102,080
22Bert O WilliamsWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$100,924
23Jawbone Cattle Co Inc.Martinsdale, MT 59053$100,661
24Kiff Ranch IncRingling, MT 59642$96,285
25Keyhole Cattle CoWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$94,838
26Higgins BrosRingling, MT 59642$93,372
27Emerald Cross RanchHarlowton, MT 59036$91,477
28Stephen G BuckinghamWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$88,768
29Teague Ranches IncWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$88,682
30Brian L BodellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$85,290
31Raschke Limited PartnershipMartinsdale, MT 59053$80,943
32Barbara Hereim Dba Hereim RanchMartinsdale, MT 59053$74,014
33Brewer RanchRingling, MT 59642$71,148
34Snowbank Ranch LLCWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$71,006
35Lucas Ranch IncRingling, MT 59642$69,615
36Rose Cattle Company LLCThree Forks, MT 59752$66,313
37Elizabeth A JohnstonWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$58,367
38Raymond N RussellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$58,316
39Alkali Lake Farms IncWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$55,127
40Ben HurwitzWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$52,123

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag