Deficiency Payment in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $103,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Townsend Ranch Inc | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $415 |
| 22 | Halmes Livestock | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $300 |
| 23 | Fred F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $288 |
| 24 | Gail F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $270 |
| 25 | Lloyd Schendel | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $228 |
| 26 | Barry R Hedrich | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $221 |
| 27 | S Alan Sundling | Livingston, MT 59047 | $199 |
| 28 | Teague Ranches Inc | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $187 |
| 29 | Riverside Ranch Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $183 |
| 30 | John T Enott | Great Falls, MT 59401 | $181 |
| 31 | Chris K Hedrich | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $181 |
| 32 | Tracy K Taylor | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $163 |
| 33 | Hussey Creek Ranch Partnership | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $110 |
| 34 | Lucas Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $97 |
| 35 | Tod Townsend | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $88 |
| 36 | Robert Hanson | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $65 |
| 37 | Jackson Ranches | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $55 |
| 38 | Orville Phillip Rostad III | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $41 |
| 39 | Snowbank Ranch | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $30 |
| 40 | James R Fowlie | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $24 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
