Farm Subsidy information
Meagher County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Meagher County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 88
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $3,083,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Higgins Bros | Ringling, MT 59642 | $10,269 |
42 | Bert O Williams | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $9,775 |
43 | , | $9,172 | |
44 | Keyhole Cattle Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,599 |
45 | Joy Short | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,589 |
46 | , | $8,499 | |
47 | Stephen G Buckingham | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,274 |
48 | Rollin' River LLC | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $8,266 |
49 | Matthew D Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $7,947 |
50 | , | $5,946 | |
51 | Ken Ogle | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,699 |
52 | Lucas Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $5,656 |
53 | Dallas C Rasmussen | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,511 |
54 | Rostad & Rostad, Inc | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $5,430 |
55 | Elizabeth A Johnston | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,282 |
56 | Down T Livestock LLC | Hobson, MT 59452 | $5,030 |
57 | Tanya Pelican | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,940 |
58 | , | $4,688 | |
59 | Mari Johnston Hamm | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,555 |
60 | Denise Lopp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”