Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 116
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $2,160,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hereim Ranch | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $18,123 |
42 | Lane Associates | Livingston, MT 59047 | $17,649 |
43 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $17,094 |
44 | Voldseth Livestock Company | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $17,006 |
45 | Gilbert Cameron | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $15,926 |
46 | Dan Rader | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $15,872 |
47 | Byron Berg | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $14,849 |
48 | Nancy S Hereim | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $14,768 |
49 | James Moe | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $14,405 |
50 | Barbara Hereim Dba Hereim Ranch | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $13,600 |
51 | Grande Ranch Co | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $12,978 |
52 | Zehntner Brothers | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $12,858 |
53 | Michael D Raschke Trust | Sun River, MT 59483 | $11,922 |
54 | The Lazy Daisy | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $11,286 |
55 | William N Schendel | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $11,102 |
56 | Richard L Indreland | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $10,516 |
57 | Wallace L Bailey | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $9,966 |
58 | Wallace E Buckingham | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $9,920 |
59 | William P Loney | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $9,853 |
60 | Wayne Buckingham | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $9,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”