Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 116

Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $2,160,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs
1995-2023
41Hereim RanchMartinsdale, MT 59053$18,123
42Lane AssociatesLivingston, MT 59047$17,649
43Catlin Ranch LpWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$17,094
44Voldseth Livestock CompanyMartinsdale, MT 59053$17,006
45Gilbert CameronMartinsdale, MT 59053$15,926
46Dan RaderWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$15,872
47Byron BergMartinsdale, MT 59053$14,849
48Nancy S HereimWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$14,768
49James MoeMartinsdale, MT 59053$14,405
50Barbara Hereim Dba Hereim RanchMartinsdale, MT 59053$13,600
51Grande Ranch CoMartinsdale, MT 59053$12,978
52Zehntner BrothersWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$12,858
53Michael D Raschke TrustSun River, MT 59483$11,922
54The Lazy DaisyMartinsdale, MT 59053$11,286
55William N SchendelWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$11,102
56Richard L IndrelandMartinsdale, MT 59053$10,516
57Wallace L BaileyWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$9,966
58Wallace E BuckinghamWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$9,920
59William P LoneyWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$9,853
60Wayne BuckinghamWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$9,383

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag