Total Conservation Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 76
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $5,022,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Helen Dupea | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $11,438 |
42 | Lucas Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $9,903 |
43 | Nancy S Hereim | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,637 |
44 | Darwin C Lehfeldt | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $8,200 |
45 | Duane Mcdaniel | Neihart, MT 59465 | $7,692 |
46 | Linda L Anderson | Rochester, WA 98579 | $7,536 |
47 | Hussey Creek Ranch Partnership | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $6,461 |
48 | Richard Roma | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,896 |
49 | Cross H Rch | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $5,895 |
50 | Ronald E Stevenson | Billings, MT 59105 | $5,547 |
51 | Lester J Walter | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,153 |
52 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $5,078 |
53 | Denise Lopp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,286 |
54 | Tod Townsend | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,000 |
55 | Trent Townsend | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $3,672 |
56 | Kenneth Mikesell | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $3,500 |
57 | George Zieg Jr | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $3,500 |
58 | Crabtree Rch Co | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $3,500 |
59 | Berg Ranch Co Inc | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $3,500 |
60 | Hereim Ranch | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $2,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”