Total Commodity Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 85
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $1,838,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brewer Land Co LLC | Ringling, MT 59642 | $7,874 |
42 | Barbara Hereim Dba Hereim Ranch | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $7,557 |
43 | William W Galt | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $7,399 |
44 | Ben Hurwitz | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $7,302 |
45 | David Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $7,139 |
46 | Rosemarie Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $7,139 |
47 | John Robidou | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $6,887 |
48 | Gary Welch | Townsend, MT 59644 | $6,847 |
49 | Joy Short | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $6,442 |
50 | Shong Ranch LLC | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $5,163 |
51 | Rebecca R Hurwitz | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $5,040 |
52 | Jawbone Cattle Co Inc. | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $4,862 |
53 | Tanya Pelican | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,707 |
54 | Roy A Stidham | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,433 |
55 | Emerald Cross Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $4,344 |
56 | Raschke Limited Partnership | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $4,291 |
57 | Elizabeth A Johnston | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $4,255 |
58 | Mari Johnston Hamm | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $3,597 |
59 | Thorson Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $3,468 |
60 | Michael R Dupea | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $3,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”