Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 107
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $6,795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Rollin' River LLC | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $19,454 |
62 | Kenneth H Yerger Jr | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $19,305 |
63 | David Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $17,748 |
64 | Rosemarie Brewer | Ringling, MT 59642 | $17,748 |
65 | Lane Associates | Livingston, MT 59047 | $17,537 |
66 | Boyd K Iverson Cattle Co | Townsend, MT 59644 | $15,876 |
67 | , | $15,548 | |
68 | Russell W Weingartner | Helena, MT 59602 | $14,203 |
69 | Arthun Ranch Inc | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $12,694 |
70 | Leland Zehntner | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $12,304 |
71 | William N Schendel | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $12,240 |
72 | Round Grove Ranch Co | Helena, MT 59601 | $11,041 |
73 | Shong Ranch LLC | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $10,976 |
74 | Harold Simmes | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $10,712 |
75 | Down T Livestock LLC | Hobson, MT 59452 | $10,247 |
76 | Running W Cattle Co | Helena, MT 59602 | $9,019 |
77 | Tanya Pelican | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,712 |
78 | Roy A Stidham | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $7,417 |
79 | John H Whelan | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $7,322 |
80 | Kenneth H Yerger | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $7,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”