Farm Subsidy information

Meagher County, Montana

Total Subsidies in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 284

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $46,893,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
61Edwin L BodellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$159,053
62, $157,657
63Bair Ranch FoundationBillings, MT 59115$154,294
64Ben HurwitzWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$150,833
65Raymond N RussellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$149,781
66Riverside Ranch CoWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$149,685
67Raschke Limited PartnershipMartinsdale, MT 59053$144,908
68Mcguire RanchesWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$141,880
69Helen DupeaWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$132,211
70Barbara RussellWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$128,082
71Barry R HedrichWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$124,997
72Dan RaderWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$123,346
73George A BergWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$122,882
74Hussey Creek Ranch PartnershipWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$119,950
75Joy ShortWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$112,390
76Bank Of The Rockies **White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$111,406
77Elizabeth A JohnstonWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$102,885
78Cheri L BaileyWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$99,101
79Chris K HedrichWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$98,134
80Matthew S Kmon LLCWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$98,126

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag