Total Commodity Programs in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 190
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $20,474,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Kenneth L Teague | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $737 |
162 | Lyle Moler | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $700 |
163 | Hereim Ranch | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $655 |
164 | Ann Valle | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $331 |
165 | Patricia Knight | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $306 |
166 | Fred F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $288 |
167 | Gail F Schafer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $270 |
168 | Ronald E Stevenson | Billings, MT 59105 | $238 |
169 | S Alan Sundling | Livingston, MT 59047 | $199 |
170 | John T Enott | Great Falls, MT 59401 | $181 |
171 | Tracy K Taylor | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $163 |
172 | Laura Diane Cazier | Townsend, MT 59644 | $151 |
173 | Douglas C Pierce | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $147 |
174 | 71 Ranch Lp | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $114 |
175 | J & L Farms | Townsend, MT 59644 | $112 |
176 | Rebecca E Johnston | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $108 |
177 | Tod Townsend | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $88 |
178 | Duane Mcdaniel | Neihart, MT 59465 | $61 |
179 | Orville Phillip Rostad III | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $41 |
180 | Maurice Holliday | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $33 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”